• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Management >Nature of the Interactions among Organizational Commitments: Complementary, Competitive or Synergistic?
【24h】

Nature of the Interactions among Organizational Commitments: Complementary, Competitive or Synergistic?

机译：组织承诺之间相互作用的性质：互补，竞争还是协同作用？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although organizational commitment is a multidimensional construct, researchers have tended to examine the independent effects of its different forms. However, doing so creates potential problems of model misspecification and under-prediction if interactions exist among different commitments. In this paper we discuss theoretically plausible interactions among different commitments, the patterns of which are expected to vary depending on the nature of the criterion and the foci of commitment. We then test these predictions via empirical data. Results revealed a 'synergistic' pattern of effects for discretionary outcomes, such that levels of organizational citizenship behaviour and strain were most favourable when employees reported high levels on multiple commitments. Importantly, no evidence was found for competitive effects between commitments, such that high levels on multiple commitments are detrimental. We discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice.
机译：尽管组织承诺是一个多维结构，但研究人员倾向于检查其不同形式的独立影响。但是，如果不同承诺之间存在相互作用，这样做会产生模型规格不正确和预测不足的潜在问题。在本文中，我们讨论了不同承诺之间的理论上合理的相互作用，预计其模式会根据准则的性质和承诺的重点而变化。然后，我们通过经验数据检验这些预测。结果表明，“自由裁量”结果具有“协同”效应，当员工报告多项承诺时，组织公民行为和压力水平最为有利。重要的是，没有证据表明承诺之间存在竞争效应，因此高水平的多项承诺是有害的。我们讨论了我们的发现对研究和实践的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号