...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of neurosurgery >Publication fate of abstracts presented at Society of British Neurological Surgeons meetings
【24h】

Publication fate of abstracts presented at Society of British Neurological Surgeons meetings

机译：在英国神经外科医师学会会议上发表摘要的出版命运

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction. Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) meetings are important national events which allow for the presentation of current academic work. The publication rate of presented abstracts is considered a proxy marker of the scientific strength of a conference. We aimed to determine the publication fate of presented abstracts at SBNS meetings over a 5-year period. Methods. A retrospective review of SBNS conference proceedings between 2001 and 2005 was performed. To ascertain whether an abstract resulted in peer-reviewed publication, a range of databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline and Ovid) were interrogated. Abstracts published in full were subsequently assessed for journal impact factor (IF), time of publication and number of citations received (per Google Scholar). Results. A total of 494 abstracts were presented. Of these, 181 abstracts were subsequently published in full, giving the conference a publication rate of 36.6%. The mean time to publication from presentation was 22 months (range 35 months pre-presentation to 133 months afterwards). The top three journals for publication were the British Journal of Neurosurgery (23.2%), Neurosurgery (7.7%) and Journal of Neurosurgery (7.7%). The IF of journal destinations ranged from no IF to 38.28 (median = 1.97). Number of citations ranged from 0 to 963 (median = 22). Abstracts with positive results were significantly more likely to be published in full compared to those with negative results (p = 0.0001). Conclusions. SBNS conferences have a respectable publication rate. Those abstracts that are published in full have gone on to gain a considerable number of citations reflecting their scientific relevance. However, studies presented at SBNS are susceptible to positive outcome bias.
机译：介绍。英国神经外科医师学会（SBNS）会议是重要的国家活动，可以介绍当前的学术工作。介绍摘要的发表率被认为是会议科学实力的代表。我们旨在确定在5年内在SBNS会议上介绍摘要的出版命运。方法。回顾性审查了2001年至2005年之间的SBNS会议程序。为了确定摘要是否导致同行评审的发表，我们对一系列数据库（PubMed，Google Scholar，Medline和Ovid）进行了询问。随后，对完整发表的摘要进行了期刊影响因子（IF），发表时间和收到的引用次数的评估（根据Google Scholar）。结果。总共提供了494个摘要。其中，有181篇摘要随后被全部发表，使会议的发表率为36.6％。从发表到发表的平均时间为22个月（发表前35个月到发表后133个月）。排名前三的期刊是《英国神经外科杂志》（23.2％），《神经外科杂志》（7.7％）和《神经外科杂志》（7.7％）。日记帐目的地的IF范围从无IF到38.28（中位数= 1.97）。被引次数为0到963（中位数= 22）。与那些具有负面结果的摘要相比，具有正面结果的摘要更有可能被完全发表（p = 0.0001）。结论SBNS会议的发布率很高。那些已全部发表的摘要已经获得了大量引用，反映了它们的科学意义。但是，SBNS上发表的研究容易出现积极的结果偏倚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号