...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Response to: Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?
【24h】

Response to: Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?

机译：回应：在预测儿童体脂方面，倒立BMI是否真的比BMI好？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We thank Dr Singhal1 for their interest in our article. The observations made by Dr Singhal are accurate in that inverted body mass index (iBMI) predicted 0.2% greater variance in body fatness than body mass index (BMI). However, we believe our assertion that iBMI is 'better' than BMI in our sample population is still valid and appropriate. This is for several reasons and not solely based on results from statistical analysis. Firstly, we would iconsider any increase in the prediction of variance in a variable to represent 'better' performance. This would hold even if the change in prediction is small, as in some instances even a small magnitude of improvement is practically important
机译：我们感谢Singhal1博士对我们的文章感兴趣。 Singhal博士所做的观察是准确的，因为反向体重指数（iBMI）预测的身体脂肪差异要比体重指数（BMI）高0.2％。但是，我们认为，在我们的样本人群中，iBMI比BMI“更好”的主张仍然是有效和适当的。这是出于多种原因，而不仅仅是基于统计分析的结果。首先，我们将变量的方差预测中的任何增加表示为代表“更好”的性能。即使预测的变化很小，这也将成立，因为在某些情况下，即使很小的改善幅度实际上也很重要

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号