首页> 外文期刊>Expert opinion on biological therapy >Erythropoietin in stroke: quo vadis.
【24h】

Erythropoietin in stroke: quo vadis.

机译:中风促红细胞生成素:vadis。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) failed in a recent clinical study to protect from damages induced by ischemic stroke. The lack of acute treatments in ischemic stroke and the promising outcome in numerous preclinical studies in vivo demands a more critical evaluation of the future use of EPO as an acute treatment. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The current use and administration of rhEPO and its analogs in animal models and the future use of this cytokine in the treatment of ischemic stroke. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: In this review the potential reasons for the failure of EPO in the clinical trial are analysed and whether the preclinical trials sufficiently evaluated the true potential of recombinant EPO and its analogs is assessed. Alternative methods for administration of EPO to enhance its potential as a neuroprotective drug in ischemic stroke are discussed. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Failure in clinical trial does not necessarily indicate the lack of therapeutic potential of EPO. This review encourages further investigation of the true potential of EPO as a candidate drug for the treatment of ischemic stroke by improved preclinical experimental design and utilization of alternative administration methods.
机译:领域的重要性:重组促红细胞生成素(rEPO)在最近的一项临床研究中未能保护免受缺血性中风引起的损害。缺血性脑卒中缺乏急性治疗,并且在许多体内临床前研究中都有希望的结果,这要求对EPO作为急性治疗的未来应用进行更严格的评估。综述中涉及的领域:rhEPO及其类似物在动物模型中的当前使用和给药,以及该细胞因子在缺血性中风治疗中的未来应用。读者将获得什么:在这篇综述中,分析了EPO在临床试验中失败的潜在原因,并评估了临床前试验是否充分评估了重组EPO及其类似物的真实潜力。讨论了给予EPO增强其作为缺血性卒中神经保护药物的潜力的替代方法。寄语:临床试验失败并不一定表明EPO缺乏治疗潜力。该综述鼓励通过改进的临床前实验设计和替代给药方法的利用来进一步研究EPO作为治疗缺血性中风的候选药物的真正潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号