首页> 外文期刊>Cancer causes and control: CCC >Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis.
【24h】

Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis.

机译:原发性腹膜癌和卵巢癌:流行病学比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We performed case-control analyses using data from the North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study to determine risk factors that distinguish primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our risk factor analyses were restricted to invasive serous cancers including 495 EOC cases, 62 PPC cases and 1,086 control women. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk factor associations. Although many case-control associations for the invasive serous PPC cases were similar to those of the invasive serous EOC cases, some differences were observed including a twofold increase in risk of invasive serous PPC in women who were >or=35 years at last pregnancy, whereas a decreased risk was observed for invasive serous EOC risk. We could not confirm a previous report of an association between tubal ligation and PPC, a factor consistently associated with a decreased risk of EOC. The difference in the risk factor associations between invasive serous PPC and EOC cancers suggests divergent molecular development of peritoneal and ovarian cancers. A larger study to determine risk factors for invasive serous PPC is warranted.
机译:我们使用北卡罗来纳州卵巢癌研究的数据进行了病例对照分析,以确定区分原发性腹膜癌(PPC)和上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的危险因素。我们的危险因素分析仅限于浸润性浆液癌,包括495例EOC病例,62例PPC病例和1,086例对照女性。使用逻辑回归分析来计算风险因素关联的调整后的优势比和95%的置信区间。尽管侵袭性浆液性PPC病例的许多病例对照协会与侵袭性浆液性EOC病例相似,但仍观察到一些差异,包括上次妊娠>或= 35岁的女性的侵袭性浆液性PPC风险增加了两倍,而观察到侵入性浆液性EOC风险降低。我们不能证实以前有关输卵管结扎与PPC之间存在关联的报道,PPC是与降低EOC风险一致相关的因素。侵袭性浆液性PPC和EOC癌症之间的危险因素关联的差异表明腹膜癌和卵巢癌的分子发展不同。确定更大的研究以确定侵袭性浆液性PPC的危险因素是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号