...
首页> 外文期刊>Mealey s Litigation Report: Lead >Pennsylvania Federal Judge: No Private Right Of Action Against Housing Authority
【24h】

Pennsylvania Federal Judge: No Private Right Of Action Against Housing Authority

机译:宾夕法尼亚州联邦法官:没有针对房屋委员会的私人诉权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Daevonna McField and Ravonnia Ray also filed claims under the Fifth and 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as claims against her former landlord John Cassidy for negligence, recklessness and breach of warranty. The PHA moved to dismiss the claims against it on the ground that there is no private right of action under the Housing Act, LBPPPA or RLBPHRA. PHA also argued that there was no violation of McField's due process or equal protection rights because no state actor affirmatively caused her injuries and no customs or policies deprived her of her rights.
机译:戴夫娜·麦克菲尔德(Daevonna McField)和拉文尼亚·雷(Ravonnia Ray)还根据《美国宪法》第五和第十四条修正案提出索赔,并针对其前房东约翰·卡西迪(John Cassidy)的过失,鲁ck和违反保证的行为提出索赔。 PHA提出以“住房法”,“ LBPPPA”或“ RLBPHRA”没有私人诉讼权为由驳回对其提出的索赔。 PHA还争辩说,没有侵犯McField的正当程序或平等保护权,因为没有国家行为者肯定地伤害了她,没有任何习俗或政策剥夺了她的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号