...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >Dialectic of the university: a critique of instrumental reason in graduate nursing education.
【24h】

Dialectic of the university: a critique of instrumental reason in graduate nursing education.

机译：大学的辩证法：对研究生护理教育中工具理性的批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Our analysis in this paper unfolds on two levels: a critique of the 'realities' of graduate nursing education and an argument to sustain its 'ideals'. We open for discussion an aspect of graduate nursing education dominated by instrumental reason, namely the research industry, using an internal critique approach developed by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno of the Early Frankfurt School. As we explain, internal critique arises out of, and relies on, the mismatch between goals, or 'ideals', and existing realities. Thinking about 'ideals' of the academy, we draw on Hans-Georg Gadamer's view of the university as a place to think freely, creatively, and critically. The contemporary realities of the university, on the other hand, that emphasize the market values of the research industry forcefully shape nursing academic scholarship in a particular direction. In our attempt to recognize and disrupt the forces of the research industry with its instrumental reason, we consider Judith Butler's writings on how norms operate in society. We show that our growing involvement in the research industry makes it very difficult to disentangle ourselves from that situation. The values of the research industry actually suppress the very ideals of education and scholarship that we would like to uphold. As a contra-force, the internal critique of the 'existing realities' in the graduate nursing education unmasks the tyranny of the research industry and makes visible the importance of sustaining the higher goals and ideals in nursing scholarship.
机译：我们在本文中的分析从两个层面展开：对研究生护理教育“现实”的批判和维持其“理想”的争论。我们将讨论由仪器理性主导的研究生护理教育的一个方面，即研究行业，使用的是法兰克福早期学院的Max Horkheimer和Theodor Adorno开发的内部批判方法。正如我们所解释的，内部批评源于并依赖于目标或“理想”与现有现实之间的不匹配。考虑到学院的“理想”，我们借鉴了汉斯·乔治·加达默尔（Hans-Georg Gadamer）对大学的看法，认为这是一个自由，创造性和批判性思考的地方。另一方面，大学的当代现实强调研究行业的市场价值，在特定方向上有力地塑造了护理学术奖学金。在我们试图以其工具性的理由认识并破坏研究行业的力量时，我们考虑了朱迪思·巴特勒关于规范如何在社会中运作的著作。我们表明，我们对研究行业的日益参与使我们很难摆脱这种局面。研究行业的价值实际上压制了我们要坚持的理想的教育和学术理想。作为一种对立力量，研究生护理教育中对“现有现实”的内部批判掩盖了研究行业的暴政，并彰显了维持护理奖学金更高目标和理想的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号