首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.
【24h】

A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

机译:开放性和腹腔镜手术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia recurrence after surgical repair is a major concern. The authors report their experience with open and laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed with the charts of 197 patients who had undergone surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias from January 2000 through August 2009, and the data for 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Surgical variables and clinical outcomes were compared using Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: The review showed that 172 patients had undergone either open mesh repair (n=61) or laparoscopic mesh repair (n=111) for recurrent inguinal hernias. Postoperative complications were experienced by 8 patients in the open group and 17 patients in laparoscopic group (p=0.70). Five patients (8.2%) in the open group and four patients (3.6%) in the laparoscopic group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.28). Four patients in the open group (9.5%) and no patients in the laparoscopic group had recurrence during long-term follow-up evaluation (p=0.046). In the laparoscopic group, 76 patients (68.5%) underwent total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, and 35 patients (31.5%) had transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Postoperative complications were experienced by 13 patients in the TEP group and 4 patients in the TAPP group (p=0.44). Two patients (2.6%) in the TEP group and two patients (5.7%) in the TAPP group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review showed no statistical difference in the re-recurrence rate between the two techniques during short-term follow-up evaluation. However, the laparoscopic technique had a significantly lower re-recurrence rate than the open technique during long-term follow-up evaluation. Both procedures were comparable in terms of intra- and postoperative complications. Among laparoscopic techniques, TEP and TAPP repair are acceptable methods for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. A multicenter prospective randomized control trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.
机译:背景:手术修复后腹股沟疝的复发是一个主要问题。作者报告了他们在开放和腹腔镜修复复发性腹股沟疝的经验。方法:经过机构审查委员会的批准,对从2000年1月至2009年8月接受外科手术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的197例患者的病历进行回顾性分析,并分析了符合纳入标准的172例患者的数据。适当地使用Student's t检验,Mann-Whitney U检验,卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较手术变量和临床结果。结果:审查显示,有172例患者因复发性腹股沟疝而接受了开放网片修补(n = 61)或腹腔镜网片修补(n = 111)。开放组8例,腹腔镜组17例发生术后并发症(p = 0.70)。开放组5例(8.2%),腹腔镜组4例(3.6%)复发性腹股沟疝(p = 0.28)。开放组中有4例患者(9.5%),腹腔镜组中没有患者在长期随访评估中复发(p = 0.046)。腹腔镜组中,有76例(68.5%)接受了全腹膜外(TEP)修复,而35例(31.5%)进行了腹膜前(TAPP)修复。 TEP组的13例患者和TAPP组的4例患者发生了术后并发症(p = 0.44)。 TEP组有2例患者(2.6%),TAPP组有2例患者(5.7%)复发性腹股沟疝(p = 0.59)。结论:本回顾性研究表明,在短期随访评估中,两种技术之间的复发率无统计学差异。但是,在长期随访评估中,腹腔镜技术的复发率明显低于开放技术。就术中和术后并发症而言,这两种方法均具有可比性。在腹腔镜技术中,TEP和TAPP修复是修复复发性腹股沟疝的可接受方法。需要进行多中心前瞻性随机对照试验来证实本研究的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号