首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior >Detailed analysis of food-reinforced operant lever pressing distinguishes effects of a cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists.
【24h】

Detailed analysis of food-reinforced operant lever pressing distinguishes effects of a cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonist and dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists.

机译:对食品增强操作杆按压的详细分析可区分大麻素CB1反向激动剂和多巴胺D1和D2拮抗剂的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Overt similarities exist between the effects of systemic cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists and dopamine (DA) antagonists on appetitive behavior. The present set of studies was undertaken to apply a fine-grained analysis of food-reinforced operant lever pressing in rats in order to compare the pattern of effects produced by administration of the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 and those induced by the DA D1 antagonist SKF 83566, and the D2 antagonist raclopride. Three groups of rats were trained on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule and administered these compounds over a range of doses expected to suppress responding. All three drugs produced a dose-related suppression of total lever pressing. In addition to main effects of dose, regression analyses were performed to determine which of several response timing- and rate-related variables correlated most strongly with overall responding in each group. It was found that total session time spent pausing from responding was significantly better at predicting responding in the AM 251 group, while both DA antagonists produced significantly stronger regression coefficients (versus AM 251) from fast responding measures. These results suggest that, while several similarities exist, CB1, D1, and D2 antagonists are not identical in their pattern of suppression of food-maintained lever pressing.
机译:全身性大麻素CB1反向激动剂和多巴胺(DA)拮抗剂对食欲行为的影响之间存在明显相似性。进行本组研究以对大鼠的食物强化操作杆按压进行细粒度分析,以比较施用CB1反向激动剂AM 251和DA D1拮抗剂SKF诱导产生的作用方式83566和D2拮抗剂雷洛必利。按固定比例5(FR5)的时间表训练三组大鼠,并以预期抑制反应的一定剂量范围内使用这些化合物。所有这三种药物都产生了与剂量相关的总杠杆压制抑制作用。除了剂量的主要影响外,还进行了回归分析,以确定与反应时间和速率相关的几个变量中哪一个与每个组的总体反应最相关。发现在AM 251组中,因响应而暂停的总会话时间明显好于预测响应,而两种DA拮抗剂均通过快速响应措施产生了明显更强的回归系数(相对于AM 251)。这些结果表明,尽管存在一些相似之处,但CB1,D1和D2拮抗剂在抑制食物保持的杠杆按压方面却不相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号