首页> 外文OA文献 >Lecture recording in higher education: risky business or evolving open practice
【2h】

Lecture recording in higher education: risky business or evolving open practice

机译:高等教育中的讲座录制:有风险的业务或不断发展的开放实践

摘要

Reports on a survey into the copyright and intellectual property (IPR) policies of UK higher education institutions with regards to lecture recording. The practice of using institutional semi-automated lecture recording systems is becoming mainstream with 71% of institutions reporting using it in 2016 (UCISA, 2016). However, these systems raise a number of issues related to copyright and IPR that in some cases are documented in specific policy documents. Issues that arise include the consent that is obtained from academic staff, the ownership of the resulting outputs and responsibility and advice given for the use of third party content in the lectures. These issues are also often linked to, or conflated with wider ethical issues such as identity, privacy and academic freedom. The findings from the survey are presented alongside a policy analysis of IPR documents and policies from 11 institutions. These are compared to the guidance provided by Jisc (2015). The findings from the survey reveal that most institutions are still developing their IPR policy with regards to lecture recording, that many institutions seek consent from lecturers, but there is an increasing move towards making lecture recording opt-out as opposed to opt-in. The survey revealed in 94% of cases the lecturers or presenter is responsible for any third party content contained within their lecture and while institutions do offer advice about dealing with third party content, much of it is delivered in a relatively passive way, through agreeing to use the system or by information made available online in guides. The findings from the policy analysis suggest that those institutions with a high level of institutional control tend to have a higher level of comprehensiveness of approach towards lecture recording. Additionally the institutions that provide a higher level of support for copyright advice, have a tendency towards open practice and higher levels of appetite for risk. Good practice advice for institutions and recommendations for further research are presented as part of this stud
机译:报告关于英国高等教育机构在讲课记录方面的版权和知识产权(IPR)政策的调查报告。使用机构半自动演讲记录系统的做法已成为主流,2016年有71%的机构报告使用该系统(UCISA,2016年)。但是,这些系统引发了许多与版权和IPR相关的问题,在某些情况下,这些问题已记录在特定的政策文件中。出现的问题包括征得学术人员的同意,结果输出的所有权以及在讲座中使用第三方内容的责任和建议。这些问题通常也与更广泛的道德问题(例如身份,隐私和学术自由)相关联或混为一谈。调查结果与11个机构对知识产权文件和政策的政策分析一起呈现。将这些与Jisc(2015)提供的指南进行了比较。调查的结果表明,大多数机构仍在制定有关演讲记录的知识产权政策,许多机构都征求了讲师的同意,但是越来越多的做法是选择退出演讲记录而不是选择加入。该调查显示,在94%的案例中,讲师或演示者应对其讲座中包含的任何第三方内容负责,而机构确实提供了有关处理第三方内容的建议,但多数是通过同意以相对被动的方式进行的。使用系统或通过指南中在线提供的信息。政策分析的结果表明,那些具有较高机构控制水平的机构往往对演讲记录的方法具有较高的综合性。另外,为版权建议提供更高水平支持的机构,倾向于开放实践并具有更高的风险偏好。作为研究的一部分,介绍了机构的良好实践建议和进一步研究的建议

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号