首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >A Mixed Methods Analysis and Evaluation of the Mixed Methods Research Literature in Engineering Education
【24h】

A Mixed Methods Analysis and Evaluation of the Mixed Methods Research Literature in Engineering Education

机译:混合方法的混合方法分析与评价工程教育中的研究文献

获取原文

摘要

Mixed methods research is still emerging as an accepted and rigorous method of inquiry. Past work on mixed methods shows that there continue to be disagreements among scholars about terminology, various ways to classify research designs, and mixed methods research characteristics. Various studies have examined quantitative and qualitative research accepted as rigorous in the field of engineering education but little work has been done on the extent that mixed methods research has been utilized by researchers in the field and the quality of that research. The content analysis presented here provides an overview of the mixed methods articles published in engineering education journals and a proposed strategy for evaluating mixed methods articles. Specifically, our intention is to provide insight into the current state of mixed methods research in the field of engineering education while discussing ways to improve this mode of inquiry. Based on our analysis, we can conclude that there is considerable variability in the quality of mixed methods articles in engineering education and that there are differences between journals in terms of the mixed methods articles they publish.
机译:混合方法研究仍然是作为接受和严谨的调查方法。过去的混合方法的工作表明,术语中的学者仍然存在分歧,分类研究设计的各种方式,以及混合方法研究特征。各种研究检测了在工程教育领域的严格被接受的定量和定性研究,但在该领域的研究人员利用了混合方法研究以及该研究的质量的情况下,已经完成了很少的工作。本文提出的内容分析概述了在工程教育期刊上公布的混合方法和拟议的评估混合方法文章的策略。具体而言,我们的目的是提供对当前在工程教育领域的混合方法研究现状的洞察,同时讨论改善这种调查模式的方法。根据我们的分析,我们可以得出结论,在工程教育中的混合方法文章质量方面存在相当大的变化,并且在他们发布的混合方法条款方面存在期刊之间存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号