首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Understanding Engineering Students' Professional Pathways: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
【24h】

Understanding Engineering Students' Professional Pathways: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study

机译:了解工程学生的专业途径:纵向混合方法研究

获取原文

摘要

According to data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), nearly two-thirds of engineering bachelor's graduates work in engineering fields immediately after college, while another 30 percent takes jobs in non-engineering fields.' Prior work, however, shows that most engineering undergraduates are "unsure" about their future career direction, even in the months leading up to graduation,2 and little is known about how and why they eventually choose what to do. Furthermore, while several college-related factors have been linked to engineering students' initial career decisions, how these and other factors actively shape their initial career steps remains understudied. To address these gaps, we designed the NSF-funded Professional Engineering Pathways Study (PEPS), a three-year collaboration aimed at understanding and enhancing the process through which engineering undergraduates explore, select, and prepare for their chosen careers (NSF-EEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). PEPS builds upon the rich tradition begun by two prior NSF-funded studies, the Academic Pathways Study (APS) and the Engineering Pathways Study (EPS), of using multi-institutional, mixed-methods research to delineate the experiences of engineering students and early career professionals. The project also features two components: the research component, and the community of practice component. The research component follows engineering students at six U.S. institutions through their junior or senior year, to examine how engineering students' career development and decision-making processes unfold over time. Also as part of this component, we are interviewing engineering faculty, student advisors, and career services staff about their perceptions of engineering students and the career resources provided to them on their campuses. The community of practice component focuses on bridging research-to-practice by engaging key stakeholders at the six partner institutions in data collection, interpretation, and dissemination activities. Outcomes from the study will include improving the career services and advising available to soon-to-be-degreed engineers at both these and other engineering schools. Currently in Year 2, we are analyzing our information-gathering interviews with faculty, advisors, and staff and sharing our initial findings with stakeholders at each of our six partner institutions for their feedback. In addition, we are preparing to conduct longitudinal surveys and interviews of junior and senior engineering students during the upcoming 2016-2017 academic year. This paper summarizes the work completed over Years 1-2, and provides background and details about the project.
机译:据美国国家科学基金会(NSF)的数据,几乎工程学士学位的毕业生中有三分之二在大学毕业后马上工程领域工作,而另外30%的工作需要非工程领域“。以前的工作,结果则显示,大多数工程本科生是“不确定”对自己未来的职业方向,即使在导致毕业几个月,2知之甚少,他们最终如何以及为什么会选择做什么。此外,虽然一些高校有关的因素都与工程专业学生的最初的职业决定,如何将这些和其他因素,积极塑造自己的职业生涯最初的步骤保持充分研究。为了解决这些差距,我们设计了NSF资助的专业工程途径研究(PEPS),为期三年的合作,旨在了解和提高,通过该工程本科探索,选择,并为他们的职业选择(NSF-EEC-准备过程1360665,1360956和1360958)。 PEPS建立在由两个前美国国家科学基金会资助的研究开始了丰富的传统,学术途径研究(APS)和工程途径研究(EPS),采用多机构的,混合方法的研究划定工程专业学生和早期的经验职业的专业人士。该项目还具有两个组成部分:研究部分,实践部分的社会。通过他们的大三或大四的研究部分如下工科学生六个的美国机构,审查工程专业学生的职业发展和决策过程是如何展开随着时间的推移。另外,作为该组件的一部分,我们也在面试他们的工程专业学生的看法,并提供给他们在他们的校园生涯资源工程学院,学生顾问,和职业服务人员。实践组件的社区侧重于在数据收集,解释和传播活动中的六个合作机构通过接合关键利益相关者的桥接研究到实践。该研究成果将包括改善就业服务,并提供给即将待学位的工程师在这两个和其他工程学校提供咨询服务。目前在2年中,我们与教师,顾问和工作人员分析我们的信息收集采访和在我们的六个合作机构与利益相关者分享我们的初步调查结果的反馈意见。此外,我们正准备在即将到来的2016-2017学年进行纵向调查,大三,大四的工程专业学生的采访。本文总结完成了1-2年的工作,并提供有关项目的背景和细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号