• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Politics of Mediation: State and Society in Labor Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China.
【24h】

The Politics of Mediation: State and Society in Labor Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China.

机译：调解政治：当代中国劳动争议解决中的国家与社会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

An expansion of mediation in China's labor disputes resolution has gathered significant momentum since the middle of the 2000s. This tendency stems from the state's long-term dependency on politicized mediatory measure to contain labor's disruptive impulses. And the fragmentation of interests inside the authoritarian regime further marginalizes laws and judicial institutions in resolving grievance. These two factors have together shaped a political opportunity structure as "mediate first" for both the labor and capital, and consequently, given a great impetus to the Grand Mediation campaign. By mobilizing grass-roots and non-judicial mediatory agencies to proactively intervene in labor conflict, the Grand Mediation has reinforced the state's capacity in managing contentious issues without resorting to either heavy handed repression or adversarial litigation. However, regarding the contradiction of the politicized mediation with workers' judicialized preference, the state's over-reliance on mediation may impel workers to alienate from institutionalized channel and subsequently deteriorates China's industrial relation. It is further argued that the prevailing of Grand Mediation may trigger off disruptive and violent labor protests in the long run. All in all, the tendency of "mediate first" reveals a dual trajectory as strong politicization and weak judicialization in contemporary China.
机译：自2000年代中期以来，在中国劳资纠纷解决方案中调解的扩大已经产生了巨大的势头。这种趋势源于国家长期依赖政治化的调解措施来遏制劳工的破坏性冲动。威权政权内部的利益分化进一步使法律和司法机构在解决申诉方面处于边缘地位。这两个因素共同构成了一种政治机会结构，对劳动力和资本来说都是“中间至上”，因此极大地推动了大调解运动。通过调动基层和非司法调解机构积极干预劳资冲突，大调解加强了该州处理有争议问题的能力，而无需诉诸于强硬的镇压或对抗性诉讼。但是，就政治化调解与工人的司法偏好的矛盾而言，国家对调解的过度依赖可能迫使工人脱离制度化的渠道，从而恶化中国的产业关系。进一步有争议的是，从长远来看，盛大调解的盛行可能引发破坏性和暴力的劳工抗议。总而言之，“中间优先”的趋势揭示了当代中国强政治化和弱司法化的双重轨迹。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhuang, Wenjia.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 279 p.
  • 总页数 279
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号