• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The social psychology of moral judgment: An empirical study of social influence and intergroup dynamics.
【24h】

The social psychology of moral judgment: An empirical study of social influence and intergroup dynamics.

机译：道德判断的社会心理学：对社会影响力和群体间动力的实证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Morality plays an important role in social life. However, very little social psychological research has been dedicated to the examination of perceptions of morality and moral judgment. This dissertation research examines the social psychology of moral judgment in a series of five empirical experiments.; The first two experiments empirically tested the situational factors influencing perceptions of morality. In the first experiment, consequences (negative vs. positive) were predicted (and found) to influence whether a behavior is categorized as a moral infraction. The same behavior resulting in negative consequences received more moral disapproval than when it resulted in positive consequences. In the second experiment, social norms were predicted their moral beliefs with the majority of their peers. Results also suggest moral beliefs and the specific application of these beliefs. The manipulation resulting in change in moral beliefs did not affect judgments regarding specific behaviors, and manipulating moral disapproval of specific behavior did not significantly affect general moral beliefs, further informing theoretical research examining lack of consistency between moral ideals and behavior.; Experiments 3 through 5 tested the role of morality in intergroup dynamics. Experiment 3 tested the prediction that individuals will be less likely to morally condemn or derogate an ingroup member than an outgroup member. Experiment 4 was tested the extent to which individuals use morality to maintain ingroup superiority and distinctiveness from outgroups, and Experiment 5 tested the prediction that moral derogation is used to discredit alternative viewpoints to one's own. The results of Experiments 3 through 5 were not consistent with predictions. In Experiment 3, the three-way interaction was opposite to that predicted. Moral derogation was directed more towards an ingroup member offending an outgroup member. Experiment 4 and 5's analyses were nonsignificant. Potential explanations for these outcomes are discussed. While it is difficult to draw conclusions from Experiments 3 through 5, the results suggest preliminary support for the role of morality in intragroup dynamics. Moral judgment may be used to influence ingroup members to conform to norms and expectations.
机译：道德在社会生活中起着重要作用。但是，很少有社会心理学研究致力于检验道德观念和道德判断。本论文的研究通过一系列五个实证实验检验了道德判断的社会心理学。前两个实验从经验上检验了影响道德观念的情境因素。在第一个实验中，预测（发现）了后果（负面还是正面），以影响行为是否被归类为道德违规行为。与导致积极后果相比，导致消极后果的同一行为在道德上受到了更多的反对。在第二个实验中，社会规范被大多数同龄人预测为他们的道德信念。结果还表明了道德信念以及这些信念的具体应用。导致道德信念发生变化的操纵行为不会影响对特定行为的判断，而操纵道德行为对特定行为的拒绝也不会显着影响一般道德信念，从而进一步为研究道德理想与行为之间缺乏一致性的理论研究提供了信息。实验3至5测试了道德在群体间动力中的作用。实验3检验了这样的预测：与外联成员相比，个人在道德上谴责或贬低内联成员的可能性较小。实验4检验了个人使用道德维持群体优越感和与众不同的程度，实验5检验了道德贬损被用来贬低他人观点的预言。实验3至5的结果与预测不一致。在实验3中，三向交互作用与预测的相反。道德上的克减更多是针对冒犯集团外成员的集团内成员。实验4和5的分析无意义。讨论了这些结果的可能解释。尽管很难从实验3到5得出结论，但这些结果表明道德在组内动态中的作用得到了初步的支持。道德判断可以用来影响团体成员遵守规范和期望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Quist, Ryan Mathew.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.; Psychology Experimental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 83 p.
  • 总页数 83
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会心理、社会行为;心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号