• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Civil and Environmental Research >Comparative Cost Analysis between Asphalt Pavement and Concrete Pavement in Road Construction: A Case study using Concrete grade 35
【24h】

Comparative Cost Analysis between Asphalt Pavement and Concrete Pavement in Road Construction: A Case study using Concrete grade 35

机译：道路施工中沥青路面与混凝土路面的比较成本分析：以35级混凝土为例

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Roads and Highways are vital lifelines. Roads are needed for accessibility and for transporting of people, goods and services. Roads are therefore needed for socio-economic purposes. This research aims at assessing the suitability of concrete grade 35 as an alternative pavement to as asphalt pavement in road construction. The objective of the research is to carry out investment appraisal on road project undertaken using concrete pavement and asphalt pavement and to compare their lifecycle costs and their initial cost of construction. The findings were as follows; the initial cost of the asphalt pavement was cheaper than concrete pavement. In terms of lifecycle costs, concrete pavement is cheaper than asphalt pavement. Investment appraisal methods were in favour of the asphalt pavement, however the present worth was in favour of concrete pavement. This was due to the high maintenance costs of asphalt pavement.
机译：道路和高速公路是至关重要的生命线。道路是交通便利和人员，货物与服务运输的必要条件。因此，出于社会经济目的需要道路。这项研究旨在评估35级混凝土在道路施工中作为沥青路面替代路面的适用性。研究的目的是对使用混凝土路面和沥青路面进行的道路项目进行投资评估，并比较其生命周期成本和初始建设成本。调查结果如下：沥青路面的初始成本比混凝土路面便宜。就生命周期成本而言，混凝土路面比沥青路面便宜。投资评估方法有利于沥青路面，但是目前的价值却有利于混凝土路面。这是由于沥青路面的高维护成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号