• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >The Mandate Refugee Program: a Critical Discussion
【24h】

The Mandate Refugee Program: a Critical Discussion

机译：任务难民计划：关键讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyzes the policy of the United Kingdom in the resettlement of mandate refugees from their country of refuge. In particular, it explains the roles of the institutions involved in the application process, namely UNHCR, the British Embassy in the country of refuge, the British Red Cross and the United Kingdom Border Agency. The article also covers the requirements that mandate refugees must meet to resettle to the United Kingdom. By considering the practical consequences of this policy for mandate refugees, the article criticizes the lack of basic procedural safeguards, such as the right to obtain an expedited decision, the right of appeal and the right to receive detailed reasons for refusals. In view of UNHCR's limited financial resources and staffing, the author takes an unfavorable view of the program's unnecessary reliance on this institution, which negatively impacts on the system's fairness. It is argued that in order to establish a program that aims to provide effective protection to refugees, the United Kingdom should review the current program and commit sufficient resources to its implementation. It is suggested that the main responsibility for accepting and considering the resettlement applications should be given to the British Embassy, that these applications should be given priority over other entry clearance applications, and that UNHCR should have a decision making role only in limited cases and with less discretion than under the current system. This article is one of the few, if not only, legal discussions on the United Kingdom's resettlement program.
机译：本文分析了联合王国将有任务的难民从其庇护国重新安置的政策。它特别说明了参与申请过程的机构的作用，即难民署，英国在避难国的使馆，英国红十字会和英国边境局。该条款还涵盖了难民重新安置到联合王国必须满足的要求。考虑到这项政策对难民的实际影响，文章批评缺乏基本的程序保障措施，例如获得快速裁决的权利，上诉权和获得拒绝的详细理由的权利。鉴于难民署的财政资源和人员有限，作者对该方案不必要地依赖该机构的做法持不利看法，这对该系统的公平性产生了负面影响。据认为，为了制定旨在向难民提供有效保护的方案，联合王国应审查现行方案并为执行该方案投入足够的资源。建议将接受和考虑重新安置申请的主要责任交给英国大使馆，与其他进入许可申请相比，应优先考虑这些申请，并且难民署应仅在有限的情况下和比目前的制度更少的自由裁量权。本文是关于英国的重新安置计划的为数不多的法律讨论之一。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2010年第3期|p.367-378|共12页
  • 作者

    Katia Bianchini*;

  • 作者单位

    *Research Fellow, Irregular Migration Group, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI);

    Solicitor, Turpin and Miller Solicitors, Oxford;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号