首页> 外文期刊>Social & economic studies >MEASURING THE UTILITY OF INSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
【24h】

MEASURING THE UTILITY OF INSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE

机译:评估公共服务机构改革的效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Jones was an early proponent of development administration who chose to advance a paradigm for that approach based on a search for technically superior models, the study and acceptability of cross-cultural public management experiences, and the promotion of "policy management styles and structures oriented to particular ideological imperatives." He characterised development administration as the new public management but distanced it from the World Bank's agenda of market-driven public administration. In the new public management it has been suggested that in some cases executive agencies may be the appropriate public service delivery mechanism.
机译:琼斯是发展管理的早期拥护者,他选择了这种方法的范式,其基础是寻求技术上的卓越模型,对跨文化公共管理经验的研究和接受以及对“政策管理风格和结构的追求”。特别的意识形态要求。”他将发展管理定性为新的公共管理,但将其与世界银行以市场为导向的公共管理议程分开。在新的公共管理中,有人建议在某些情况下执行机构可能是适当的公共服务提供机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号