首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension >Institutional innovation and public extension services provision: the Marche Regional Administration reform in central Italy.
【24h】

Institutional innovation and public extension services provision: the Marche Regional Administration reform in central Italy.

机译:制度创新和公共推广服务的提供:意大利中部的马尔凯地区行政管理部门改革。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper describes how Marche Regional Administration (MRA) introduced an innovative institutional reform of an Agricultural Knowledge and Information System (AKIS) in central Italy. In order to study the main features of the MRA reform we used a methodological approach based on three steps: (i) first we applied a desk analysis to sketch the main elements of the reform; (ii) we then analyzed farmers' assessment of the institutional change by using information derived from a field survey on a sample of beneficiaries, and (iii) using a focus group technique. We found that MRA reform introduced an institutional innovation in the domain of public extension services (ES) provision within the Italian context. However, the assessment of the short-term effects indicate that the original objectives of the reform have been only partially achieved. This is in line with other experiences presented in the literature and confirms the difficulties to introduce institutional innovation in the domain of AKIS. The paper describes the analysis of an institutional reform in the AKIS domain which has been considered a 'best practice' within the Italian context. Using an institutional analysis approach the paper provides an original way of looking at a 'new' model for organizing public ES.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.559081
机译:本文介绍了马尔凯地区管理局(MRA)如何在意大利中部对农业知识和信息系统(AKIS)进行了创新的体制改革。为了研究MRA改革的主要特征,我们使用了基于三个步骤的方法:(i)首先,我们采用案头分析来概述改革的主要内容; (ii)然后我们使用对受益人样本进行实地调查得出的信息来分析农民对制度变迁的评估,以及(iii)使用焦点小组技术。我们发现,MRA改革在意大利范围内在公共扩展服务(ES)提供领域引入了体制创新。但是,对短期影响的评估表明,改革的最初目标仅部分实现。这与文献中提供的其他经验是一致的,并证实了在AKIS领域引入制度创新的困难。本文介绍了对AKIS领域的制度改革的分析,该制度被认为是意大利范围内的“最佳实践”。本文使用一种制度分析方法,为研究组织公共ES的“新”模型提供了一种原始方法。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.559081

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号