• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology >Measuring the disparity of categorical risk among various sex offender risk assessment measures
【24h】

Measuring the disparity of categorical risk among various sex offender risk assessment measures

机译：衡量各种性犯罪者风险评估措施中类别风险的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The focus on reducing sexual offending has led to the development of risk assessment measures and schemes to predict reoffending, prioritize the allocation of treatment and supervision resources, and ensure public safety. However, different risk assessment approaches may not always have high agreement on the same individual. In light of the research indicating that ordinal risk rankings are most commonly used and reported in various risk communications, this study compares four risk assessment approaches, namely the Static-99R, Static-2002R, Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide, and SVR-20, in order to evaluate the disparities among the risk categories of these measures. The results indicate that there are disparities between all of the risk measures; but, many of these can be explained by structural differences and common overlapping dimensions in the measures. Possible explanations for and implications of the discrepancies, along with some guidance on determining which approach to use, are discussed.
机译：对减少性犯罪的关注导致制定了风险评估措施和计划，以预测再犯罪，优先分配治疗和监督资源并确保公共安全。但是，不同的风险评估方法可能不一定总是在同一个人上达成一致。鉴于研究表明在各种风险沟通中最常使用和报告有序风险排名，因此本研究比较了四种风险评估方法，即Static-99R，Static-2002R，性犯罪者风险评估指南和SVR-20，为了评估这些措施的风险类别之间的差异。结果表明，所有风险措施之间存在差异。但是，其中许多可以通过措施中的结构差异和共同的重叠维度来解释。讨论了差异的可能解释和含义，以及确定使用哪种方法的一些指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号