...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Immobility and Mobility Seen Through Trip-Based Versus Time-Use Surveys
【24h】

Immobility and Mobility Seen Through Trip-Based Versus Time-Use Surveys

机译:通过基于出行和时间使用调查的不动和机动性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nationwide Transport Surveys and Time-Use Surveys both reflect the daily agendas and schedules of the reporting individuals and should therefore yield comparable indicators of travel behaviour; for instance: immobility rate (share of persons not leaving the home on any one day), daily travel time, and number of trips per day. These two surveys exist in three countries from the same time period: Belgium, France, Great Britain. The comparisons demonstrate that they tell parallel stories, but that the levels of the variables are significantly different with lower immobility rates and longer travel times reported in the Time-Use Surveys. These surveys should therefore be integrated in the analysis of travel behaviour analysis as a crucial yardstick. In Europe, where Nationwide Travel Surveys are intermittent and not harmonized, the harmonised Time-Use Surveys allow for crucial European-wide comparisions across time and space.
机译:全国运输调查和时间使用调查均反映了报告个人的日常议程和时间表,因此应得出可比的旅行行为指标;例如:出行率(一天中没有离开家的人的比例),每天的旅行时间和每天的出行次数。这两个调查同时存在于三个国家/地区:比利时,法国,英国。比较结果表明,他们讲的是平行故事,但是在时间使用调查中报告的变量水平明显不同,因为固定率较低且旅行时间较长。因此,这些调查应作为出行准绳纳入旅行行为分析中。在欧洲,全国旅行调查是断断续续且不统一的,而统一的时间使用情况调查则可以跨时空进行欧洲范围内的重要比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号