• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of family therapy >Commentary: A different lens for working with affairs: Using social constructionist and attachment theory
【24h】

Commentary: A different lens for working with affairs: Using social constructionist and attachment theory

机译：评论：处理事务的另一种视角：使用社会建构论和依恋理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A combined social constructivist and attachment theory approach can help in work with affairs. Using past empirical research, a case is made that vulnerability to affairs derives primarily from pressures on partnerships stemming from the dominant discourse of modern partnerships. This discourse exalts sharing and joining, subjugating the more common experience of couples that other meaningful relationships (including non-sexual ones) augment and fill in gaps. Affairs may be seen as, perhaps misguided, attempts to address untenable goals of the dominant discourse. Concomitantly, attachment theory explains both the need to be in a variety of relationships, normally within a hierarchy ('multiple attachments') and also the extreme wounds attendant to the discovery of secret affairs. Using both these perspectives can be useful preceding attempts at forgiveness. It is argued that they help therapists to establish an empathic positioning toward both partners in the couple, rather than the moralistic one too frequently attendant in work with affairs. Journal of Family Therapy
机译：社会建构主义者和依恋理论相结合的方法可以帮助处理事务。使用过去的经验研究，可以得出这样的情况：对事务的脆弱性主要来自现代合伙企业占主导地位的话语对合伙企业的压力。这种话语提升了分享和加入的热情，降低了夫妻之间更为普遍的经历，即其他有意义的关系（包括非性关系）扩大并填补了空白。事务可能被视为试图解决占主导地位的话语的不可持续目标的尝试。伴随的是，依恋理论不仅说明了处于各种关系中的必要性（通常在一个层次结构中（“多个依恋”）），而且还解释了秘密事务发现所带来的极大创伤。在宽恕之前尝试使用这两种观点可能会很有用。有人说，他们帮助治疗师对夫妻双方的同情者建立同理心的定位，而不是在事务上经常陪伴的道德家。家庭疗法杂志

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号