...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of nursing education >Flaws of Multiple Choice Questions in Teacher-Constructed Nursing Examinations: A Pilot Descriptive Study
【24h】

Flaws of Multiple Choice Questions in Teacher-Constructed Nursing Examinations: A Pilot Descriptive Study

机译：教师构建护理检查中多项选择题的缺陷：试点描述性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: In many middle eastern universities, English is the medium of instruction and testing. As nurse educators construct multiple choice questions (MCQs), it is essential that items are developed to be valid and reliable to assess student learning. Method: This study examined the structure of 98 MCQs included in nursing examinations at three middle eastern universities using a checklist composed of 22 literature-based principles. Results: Ninety MCQs (91.8%) experienced one or more item-writing flaws. Examples of these included linguistic errors, various problems with the stem, and answer options. Of importance, most faculty did not use item analysis to assess the integrity of the examinations. Conclusion: Results confirm concerns about the standards faculty use for test construction and item analysis. Universities must ensure that the faculty they hired are fluent in English. Faculty would also benefit from workshops that focus on test construction and the use of item analysis.
机译：背景：在许多中东大学，英语是教学和测试的媒介。 随着护士教育工作者构建多项选择问题（MCQ），必须开发项目以有效可靠地评估学生学习。 方法：本研究检测了使用由基于22个文学的原则组成的核对列表，在三所中东大学中纳入98名MCQ的结构。 结果：九十MCQ（91.8％）经历了一个或多个物品写入缺陷。 这些示例包括语言错误，茎干的各种问题，以及回答选项。 重要性，大多数教师没有使用物品分析来评估考试的完整性。 结论：结果证实了对测试建设和项目分析的标准教师的担忧。 大学必须确保他们雇用的教师流利地英语。 教师还将受益于专注于测试结构和物品分析的使用的研讨会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号