• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >An evaluation of community pharmacists’ understanding of autism spectrum disorder: a cross‐sectional study in Western Australia
【24h】

An evaluation of community pharmacists’ understanding of autism spectrum disorder: a cross‐sectional study in Western Australia

机译：社区药剂师对自闭症谱系障碍理解的评价：西澳大利亚横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Objectives To assess the knowledge and understanding of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by community pharmacists, across Western Australia (WA) and evaluate the extent to which they incorporate ASD friendly practices in their pharmacy. Methods A cross‐sectional study involved a postal questionnaire sent to a stratified random sample of 250 community pharmacies across WA. A score of ≥10/13 (≥76.9%) appropriate responses to selected questions was considered an indication of ‘good knowledge’ of ASD. Univariate associations between ‘good knowledge’ and variables in the questionnaire were analysed using chi‐square statistics, and multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model. Demographic data relating to the pharmacy were used to determine the likelihood it was ASD friendly. Key findings Overall, 97/250 (38.8%) questionnaires were returned. There were 34/96 (35.4%) respondents classified as having ‘good knowledge’. Stigma surrounding ASD was the single best indicator of ‘good knowledge’ ( P ??0.0001). None of the respondents indicated they catered specifically for ASD, and 38/97 (39.2%) reported that no changes were needed to their pharmacy to improve accessibility. There were a number of demographic features that increased the likelihood that pharmacies had the potential to be ASD friendly. Conclusions Pharmacists overall had a basic understanding of ASD. Pharmacists who identified that stigma surrounding ASD existed in the community were more likely to achieve ‘good knowledge’. There was a reluctance to improve pharmacy accessibility to patients with ASD. Pharmacists did not appear to incorporate ASD beneficial practices into their pharmacy and pharmacy environment.
机译：摘要目的，以评估澳大利亚西澳大利亚（WA）的社区药剂师的知识和理解，并评估他们在其药房中纳入ASD友好实践的程度。方法横截面研究涉及邮政调查问卷，送到WA的分层随机样品。评分≥10/ 13（≥76.9％）对所选问题的适当响应被认为是ASD“良好知识”的迹象。使用Chi-Square统计分析问卷中的“良好知识”和变量之间的单变量协会，使用逻辑回归模型进行多变量分析。与药房有关的人口统计数据用于确定asd友好的可能性。关键调查结果总体而言，97/250（38.8％）返回问卷。有34/96（35.4％）受访者分类为“良好的知识”。 STIGMA周围的ASD是“良好知识”的单一最佳指标（P？＆？0.0001）。他们没有特别用于ASD的受访者，38/97（39.2％）报告说，他们的药房不需要更改以改善可访问性。有许多人口统计学特征可以增加药房有可能成为ASD友好的可能性。结论药剂师总体对ASD的基本了解。发现围绕ASD的耻辱存在的药剂师更有可能实现“良好的知识”。没有愿意改善ASD患者的药物可访问性。药剂师们没有将ASD有益实践纳入其药房和药房环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号