首页> 外文期刊>Journal of youth and adolescence >Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator
【24h】

Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator

机译:社交媒体社会比较能力(但不意见)预测较低的身份清晰度:身份处理风格作为调解员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social comparison on social media has received increasing attention, but most research has focused on one type of social comparison and its psycho-emotional implications. Little is known about how different types of social comparison influence youth's identity development. Drawing on the theories of identity processing styles and social comparison, we examined how two different forms of social comparison on social media related to three identity processing styles, which in turn predicted youth's global self-esteem and identity clarity. We surveyed 219 college freshmen (M-age=18.29; 74% female) once in the Fall and once in the Spring. Social comparison of ability on social media was related to concurrent diffuse-avoidant identity processing style, which predicted lower identity clarity months later. In contrast, social comparison of opinion on social media did not influence college freshmen's global self-esteem and identity clarity through identity processing styles. The findings clarified the implications of online social comparison for youth's identity development.
机译:社交媒体的社会比较受到了越来越关注,但大多数研究都集中在一种社会比较和其心理情绪影响。众所周知,关于不同类型的社会比较影响青年的身份发展。借鉴身份处理风格和社会比较的理论,我们研究了与三个身份加工风格相关的社交媒体的两种不同形式的社会比较,从而预测青年的全球自尊和身份清晰度。我们在秋季调查了219名大学新生(M龄= 18.29; 74%的女性),春季一次。社交媒体能力的社会比较与并发弥漫性的避免身份处理风格有关,该方法预测了几个月的较低的特殊性。相比之下,社会媒体意见的社会比较通过身份处理风格,没有影响大学新生的全球自尊和特殊清晰度。该研究结果澄清了在线社会比较对青年的身份发展的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号