...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of epidemiology >The adoption of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis case definitions to assess prevalence: A systematic review
【24h】

The adoption of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis case definitions to assess prevalence: A systematic review

机译：通过慢性疲劳综合症/肌性脑脊髓炎病例定义评估患病率：系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose: Prevalence estimates have been based on several case definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The purpose of this work is to provide a rigorous overview of their application in prevalence research. Methods: A systematic review of primary studies reporting the prevalence of CFS since 1990 was conducted. Studies were summarized according to study design, prevalence estimates, and case definition used to ascertain cases. Results: Thirty-one studies were retrieved, and eight different case definitions were found. Early estimates of CFS prevalence were based on the 1988 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Australian, and Oxford. The 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, has been adopted internationally, as a general standard. Only one study has reported prevalence according to the more recent, Canadian Consensus Criteria. Additional estimates were also found according to definitions by Ho-Yen, the 2005 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention empirical definition, and an epidemiological case definition. Conclusions: Advances in clinical case definitions during the past 10 years such as the Canadian Consensus Criteria have received little attention in prevalence research. Future assessments of prevalence should consider adopting more recent developments, such as the newly available International Consensus Criteria. This move could improve the surveillance of more specific cases found within CFS.
机译：目的：流行率估算是基于慢性疲劳综合症（CFS）的几种病例定义。这项工作的目的是对流行病学研究中的应用进行严格的概述。方法：对报道1990年以来CFS患病率的基础研究进行了系统回顾。根据研究设计，患病率估计和用于确定病例的病例定义对研究进行了总结。结果：检索了31项研究，发现了8种不同的病例定义。 CFS患病率的早期估计是基于1988年澳大利亚，牛津和牛津的疾病控制与预防中心。但是，1994年的疾病控制与预防中心已被国际普遍采用。根据最新的《加拿大共识标准》，只有一项研究报告了患病率。根据Ho-Yen的定义，2005年疾病控制和预防中心的经验定义以及流行病学病例定义，还发现了其他估算值。结论：在过去的10年中，诸如加拿大共识标准之类的临床病例定义方面的进展在患病率研究中很少受到关注。未来的患病率评估应考虑采用最近的发展，例如新近可用的《国际共识标准》。此举可以改善对粮安委内发现的更具体病例的监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号