首页> 外文期刊>Infants and young children >Parental Reports of Perceived Assessment Utility: A Comparison of Authentic and Conventional Approaches
【24h】

Parental Reports of Perceived Assessment Utility: A Comparison of Authentic and Conventional Approaches

机译:父母的感知评估效用报告:真实方法和常规方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined parent reports of 2 assessment approaches used for eligibility determination: conventional and authentic. Parents of children with and without disabilities completed a satisfaction survey following each of 2 assessments. Differences in how parents perceived the utility of developmental assessments based on the type of assessment approach (ie, either conventional or authentic), the setting in which the assessment occurred, and the child's eligibility status were examined. Results of this study have implications for conducting authentic, developmental assessments with children and families used for eligibility determination.
机译:这项研究检查了用于确定资格的两种评估方法的父级报告:常规方法和真实方法。残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的父母在进行了两次评估后均完成了满意度调查。根据评估方法的类型(即常规或真实),评估发生的环境以及孩子的资格状况,对父母对发展评估的效用的看法有所不同。这项研究的结果对于对用于资格认定的儿童和家庭进行真实的,发展的评估具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号