首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >Is balance exercise training as effective as aerobic exercise training in fibromyalgia syndrome?
【24h】

Is balance exercise training as effective as aerobic exercise training in fibromyalgia syndrome?

机译:在纤维肌痛综合征中,平衡运动训练与有氧运动训练一样有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim was to compare the effect of aerobic and balance exercises on pain severity, myalgic score, quality of life, exercise capacity and balance in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). A total of 33 females diagnosed with FMS by the American College of Rheumatology criteria were recruited in this randomised controlled study and allocated to aerobic exercise (AE) or balance exercise (BE) groups. Exercises were performed three times a week, for 6 weeks on a treadmill or with a Tetrax interactive balance system (TIBS). Outcome measures were characterised by myalgic score, visual analogue scale, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), exercise testing, Timed Up-Go (TUG) and TIBS measurements. Comparisons from baseline to 6 weeks were evaluated using Wilcoxon test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between groups. Effect sizes were also calculated. Improvements in pain, myalgic score and FIQ were found in both groups (p < 0.05). While comparing groups, myalgic score was significant (p = 0.02, d = -1.77), the value was higher in AE. Exercise duration, Borg scale, resting blood pressures (RBP) and maximal heart rate were significant in AE. In BE, Borg scale, exercise duration was significant (p < 0.05). While comparing groups, diastolic RBP (p = 0.04, d = -0.92), exercise duration (p = 0.00, d = -1.64) were significant, with higher values in AE. TUG significantly changed in groups (p < 0.05, d ≥ -1.22). Stability scores, eyes open while standing on elastic pads (p = 0.00, d = -0.98) and head back (p = 0.03, d = -0.74), were significant, with higher values in BE. This study showed that BE provided some improvements in FMS, but AE training led to greater gains. BE training should be included in comprehensive programs.
机译:目的是比较有氧运动和平衡运动对纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的疼痛严重程度,肌力评分,生活质量,运动能力和平衡的影响。在这项随机对照研究中,总共招募了33名通过美国风湿病学会诊断为FMS的女性,并将其分配到有氧运动(AE)或平衡运动(BE)组中。每周进行三次锻炼,在跑步机上或使用Tetrax交互式天平系统(TIBS)进行6周。结果测量的指标是:肌力评分,视觉模拟量表,纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ),运动测试,定时运动(TUG)和TIBS测量。使用Wilcoxon检验评估从基线到6周的比较。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组之间的差异。还计算了效果大小。两组的疼痛,肌痛评分和FIQ均得到改善(p <0.05)。在比较各组时,其肌力评分显着(p = 0.02,d = -1.77),AE值较高。运动时间,博格量表,静息血压(RBP)和最大心率在AE中很显着。在BE,Borg量表中,运动时间显着(p <0.05)。在比较各组时,舒张压RBP(p = 0.04,d = -0.92),运动时间(p = 0.00,d = -1.64)显着,而AE值较高。各组的TUG显着变化(p <0.05,d≥-1.22)。稳定性评分,站立在弹性垫上时睁眼(p = 0.00,d = -0.98)和向后仰(p = 0.03,d = -0.74)的得分显着,BE值较高。这项研究表明,BE在FMS方面提供了一些改进,但是AE培训带来了更大的收获。 BE培训应纳入综合计划中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号