• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Assessment of perioperative complications following primary bariatric surgery according to the Clavien-Dindo classification: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-Y gastric bypass
【24h】

Assessment of perioperative complications following primary bariatric surgery according to the Clavien-Dindo classification: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-Y gastric bypass

机译：根据Clavien-Dindo分类评估原发性减肥手术后的围手术期并发症：袖式胃切除术和Roux-Y胃旁路术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the gold-standard procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. It has been reported to be somewhat more efficient and durable than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). However, it is considered more invasive and, therefore, more hazardous. There is a lack of unity in complication reporting following bariatric surgery. Thus, there is a possible misconception regarding the relative safety of the two major bariatric procedures performed worldwide. This may have contributed to a shift in practice with LSG gaining momentum "at the expense" of LRYGBP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative safety of primary LSG and LRYGBP according to the Clavien-Dindo complication grading system.
机译：背景腹腔镜Roux-Y胃搭桥术（LRYGBP）是治疗病态肥胖症的金标准程序。据报道，它比腹腔镜袖式胃切除术（LSG）更加有效和耐用。但是，它被认为更具侵入性，因此更加危险。减肥手术后的并发症报告缺乏统一性。因此，对于在全球范围内执行的两种主要减肥手术的相对安全性可能存在误解。这可能是由于LSG在“牺牲” LRYGBP的情况下获得势头而导致实践转变的原因。这项研究的目的是根据Clavien-Dindo并发症分级系统评估原发LSG和LRYGBP的相对安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号