您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)

安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)

安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)的相关文献在2002年到2021年内共计55篇,主要集中在口腔科学、特种医学 等领域,其中期刊论文55篇、专利文献143031篇;相关期刊28种,包括海峡科学、实用临床医药杂志、中国美容医学等; 安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)的相关文献由134位作者贡献,包括刘晓君、姚霜、杨苹等。

安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:55 占比:0.04%

专利文献>

论文:143031 占比:99.96%

总计:143086篇

安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)—发文趋势图

安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)

-研究学者

  • 刘晓君
  • 姚霜
  • 杨苹
  • 杨霜
  • 段银钟
  • 葛尚军
  • 徐建平
  • 戴娟
  • 蔡斌
  • 陈海
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

学科

年份

    • 任嘉杰; 冯小东; 宋铁砾
    • 摘要: 目的:探究安氏Ⅱ1不同拔牙模式矫治前后牙弓、上气道形态及软组织侧貌变化的临床疗效.方法:选择2016年6月-2020年6月来笔者医院就诊的98例安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形需拔牙矫治的患者,按照随机数表法分成观察组和对照组,每组49例.观察组拔除上颌2颗第一前磨牙和下颌2颗第二前磨牙,对照组拔除上颌2颗第一前磨牙,之后采用矫正器进行矫正.比较治疗前后两组患者牙弓、上气道形态及软组织侧貌变化.结果:治疗后,两组上、下颌尖牙间宽度及上、下颌第一磨牙间宽度均减小,但观察组均小于对照组(P0.05);治疗后,两组鼻唇角增大,颏唇角增大,上下唇突度减小,但两组间无明显差异(P>0.05).结论:拔除上颌2颗第一前磨牙和下颌2颗第二前磨牙对安氏Ⅱ1错牙合患者牙弓及上气道形态影响大于拔除上颌2颗第一前磨牙,两种拔牙方式均能改善面部软组组侧貌,但差异无明显区别.
    • 李玉如; 闫亚姿; 李敬谦
    • 摘要: 目的 对安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形临界病例拔牙与非拔牙矫治后的咬合情况进行观察分析.方法 选取2016年9月至2018年9月于郑州大学第一附属医院惠济院区口腔正畸科就诊的安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形患者矫治结束的临界病例30例,再以患者实际已经完成的治疗分为非拔牙组(16例)和拔牙组(14例),使用咬合分析仪记录两组患者矫治结束后的全牙列接触面积(TCA)、全牙列总力度值(TOF)、单位面积力值、咬合力中心点(COF)、牙合力不对称指数(AOF),对非拔牙和拔牙患者的以上咬合接触数据进行分析比较.结果 非拔牙组的TCA、TOF均大于拔牙组,差异有统计学意义(均P0.05).结论 非拔牙矫治的患者在咬合接触面积和咬合力方面比拔牙矫治患者更有优势.
    • 任继业
    • 摘要: 目的:通过Pancherz法对比研究微种植钉支抗在SUS2固定功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ1类中的作用特点.方法:应用SUS2下颌前伸矫治器联合固定矫治器分别对24例安氏Ⅱ1类下颌后缩病例进行功能矫治,其中12例不使用微种植钉支抗,为C组,另外12例采用微种植钉增加下颌牙弓支抗,为T组,所有患者治疗6~8个月,治疗前后摄头颅侧位片,并进行Pan-cherz头影测量分析,SPSS 15.0统计学软件进行t检验.结果:2组患者治疗前后颏前点位置改变(Δpg/OLp),下颌切牙变化(Δli/OLp-Δpg/OLp)和下颌磨牙变化(Δlm/OLp-Δpg/OLp)均有统计学差异.2组覆盖明显减小,C组骨因素45.8%,牙因素54.2%,T组骨因素71.2%,牙因素28.8%.两组磨牙关系均得到改善,C组骨因素54.6%,牙因素45.4%,T组骨因素81.4%,牙因素18.6%.结论:2种方法矫治Ⅱ1类错均可促进下颌骨生长,改善覆盖和磨牙关系.Pancherz分析法分析表明,在前牙覆盖及磨牙关系的改善中,SUS2联合微种植钉支抗表现出相对更多的骨性变化.
    • 任小华; 韩红娟; 吴浩
    • 摘要: Objective To study the mandibular rotation of adolescent angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions after orthopedic treatment.Methods 70 adolescent patients with angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions were divided into treatment group (G1)(average aged 10.1± 2.3 year) treated with activator for 12months and control group (G0) (average aged 9.2±4.1year) used as control.The lateral cephalograms of each patients were gotten at pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) times of the study.Structure superposition method was used to analyze the relate indexes on the lateral cephalograms.Results Functional orthopedic treatment of adolescent patients with angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions had no effects on the mandibular rotations,but it can change the growth amount and direction of the condylar which direction became more backward and upward,while the growth amount became larger than the untreated control group.The condylar growth direction showed positive relation to mandibular total rotation and intramatrix rotation.Conclusion Orthopedic treatment of adolescent angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions could get good result from regulate the growth direction and amount of condylar and had no effect to the mandibular rotations.%目的 探讨青春期安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)患者功能矫行治疗后下颌骨旋转的变化.方法 将70例青春期安氏Ⅱ1错颌患者随机分为治疗组(G1)与对照组(G0),每组各35例,对照组不做治疗,观察12个月,治疗组采用肌激动矫治器治疗12个月,实验开始(T1期)与结束(T2期)拍摄所有患者的头侧位X光片,采用结构重叠法对头侧位X光片上相关指标进行测量分析,所得数据进行统计分析.结果 治疗组下颌综合长度明显增加,髁突生长量明显增加,生长方向明显向后向上,髁突的生长方向与髁突总旋转和基质内旋转明显正相关,生长量与下颌旋转无相关性.结论 青春期安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)行功能矫形治疗能通过改变髁突生长方向和生长量来取得较好的临床治疗效果,对下颌骨的旋转影响不明显.
    • 陈峥; 林紫燕; 王海燕
    • 摘要: 目的 观察安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)患者接受Twin-Block矫治器治疗前后下颌骨及颞下颌关节区域的三维变化,分析Twin-Block矫治器对下颌骨生长发育以及颞下颌关节的影响.方法 选取2015年12月~2017年2月间生长发育高峰期安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)患者20例,拍摄Twin-Block矫治器矫治前后的CBCT,导入Dolphin软件进行下颌骨三维重建后定点测量,运用SPSS软件统计分析下颌骨以及颞下颌关节的变化.结果 治疗后双侧下颌升支长、喙突长以及下颌骨综合长度、髁突内外径长、冠状向的髁突宽长度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但是其余关于颞下颌关节以及下颌骨的测量项目比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 Twin-Block矫治器能刺激安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)患者的下颌体长度、升支高度以及下颌综合长度、髁突内外径、冠状位的髁突宽度增长.
    • 李国永; 蔡斌
    • 摘要: 目的 通过细丝弓技术在高角安氏Ⅱ类1分类拔牙患者直丝弓矫治中的应用,探讨其矫治前后软硬组织的变化,为临床正畸设计和矫治提供参考.方法 本研究采用回顾性的研究方法,以符合纳入标准的17例正畸患者为研究对象矫治前后拍摄头颅侧位定位片,对头影测量结果应用SPSS15.0软件进行统计分析.结果 17例高角安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)患者矫治结束后,磨牙和尖牙关系中性,覆(牙合)覆盖正常.正畸治疗后矢状向ANB角减小1.18°,U1-NA角减小19.13°,L1-NB角减小6.42°,L1-MP角减小5.28°,颏突度增加0.46mm,颏倾斜度减小3.99°,有统计学意义.垂直向OP-MP角减小0.19°,L6-MP距增加0.98 mm,有统计学意义,而上、下颌切牙和上磨牙垂直变化无统计学意义.矫治后软组织侧貌明显改善,面型角减小4.56°,鼻唇角增加16.48°,上、下唇突点距离审美平面减小4.93 mm和3.99 mm,PosB’-FH角增加6.88°,有统计学意义.结论 高角安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者拔除四颗第一双尖牙,采用直丝弓矫治器矫治,矫治过程中应用细丝弓矫治技术可以对患者矢状向和垂直向达到良好的支抗控制,矫治后软组织侧貌明显改善.%Objective To investigate the soft and hard tissue changes in Class Ⅱ Division 1 high angle extraction cases treated by light archwire technique with straight archwire appliance.Methods Seventeen Class Ⅱ Division 1 patients with high angle who met the including criteria were included into this retrospective study.Cephalometrics of pre and post treatment lateral films were traced by hands and its statistical analysis was performed via SPSS 15.0 software package.Results After treatment of the seventeen subjects,molar and cuspid relationships were Class Ⅰ and normal overjet and overbite were established.ANB and U1-NA decreased by 1.18°and 19.13°respectively.L1-NB and L1-MP decreased by 6.42° and 5.28°.OP-MP and tilt angle of chin decreased by 0.19°and 3.99°.Prominence of chin increased by 0.46 mm.L6-MP increased by 0.98mm.These changes were statistical significant.However,vertical changes for incisors and upper molar showed no significant changes.Remarkable soft tissue change was noted after orthodontic treatment.FCA decreased by 4.56° and NLA increased by 16.48°.The prominence of upper and lower lips to aesthetic plane decrease by 4.93 mmand 3.99 mm.PosB'-FH increased by 6.88°.These changes showed statistical significance.Conclusions The Class Ⅱ Division 1 patients who were treated by light archwire technique with straight archwire appliance could get good control of the vertical dimension in high angle cases after four first premolars extraction and the profile could be improved significantly.
    • 杨大鹏; 丁士育; 翟俊辉
    • 摘要: 目的 应用PASS矫治器(生理性支抗Spee氏弓矫治器)对安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)进行矫治,观察其临床效果.方法 选取20例安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)畸形患者,拔除4个第一双尖牙,应用PASS矫治器进行矫治,对治疗前后头影测量项目进行统计学分析.结果 20例患者平均疗程16.2±2.2月.矫治后ANB角减小0.99°,U1-SN角减小16.06°,U1-L1角增加14.60°,U1-NA减小7.13 mm,L1-NB减小2.01 mm,前牙覆(牙合)和覆盖分别减小了1.99 mm和6.88 mm,以上测量项目变化有统计学意义.结论 应用PASS矫治器对安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)畸形矫治能得到很好的矫治效果.%Objective To observe the clinical effects of PASS appliance (Physiclogic Anchorage Control appliance) in the treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 patients.Methods 20 patients with Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion were extracted 4 first premolars and treated with PASS appliance.Cephalometric analysis was carried out before and after treatment.Results The average treatment time was 16.2 months.After treatment,ANB angle,U1-SN,U1-NA,L1-NB,overbite and overjet decreased by 0.99°,16.06°,7.13 mm,2.01 mm,1.99 mm and 6.88 mm,respectivelt.U1-L1 increased by 14.6°.Significant difference was found in all measurements before and after treatment.Conclusions PASS appliance could be effectively used in the treatment of Class Ⅱ1 patients.
    • 梁艳; 钱红; 孙文红
    • 摘要: 目的:研究微种植体支抗在安氏Ⅱ1错牙合治疗中的作用。方法:选取20例临床诊断为安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合的恒牙列患者,年龄18~29岁,平均年龄23.5岁。将患者随机分成两组:微种植体支抗组10例(男5例,女5例),传统支抗组10例(男5例,女5例)。两组均采用拔牙矫治,拔除上、下颌四颗第一前磨牙,应用MBT直丝弓矫治技术。对两组治疗前后的X线头影测量值进行统计分析。结果:应用两种支抗方法都能使上颌切牙的唇倾度和突度发生显著而有利的改变(<0.01),而使用微种植体作为支抗可以更大程度内收上前牙;上颌磨牙无明显近移;唇部软组织变化更大,因此面型也改善得更好。而下颌平面角和牙合平面在微种植支抗组无明显改变(>0.05)。结论:应用微种植体加强支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合效果更显著,并且可以缩短疗程,值得临床广泛推广应用。%Objective To investigate the effect of micro- implant (MIA) anchorage in the treatment of Angle Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Methods 20 patients aged 18- 29 years old (23.5 on average) in permanent dentition with Angle Class II Division 1 (II1) malocclusion were selected. Then, they were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (using MIA): 10 patients (5 males, 5 females);Group B (using traditional anchorage:Nance arch and trans- palatal arch):10 patients(5 males, 5 females).Both groups had four 1st premolars extracted.MBT technique was used in the following orthodontic treatment. Finally we performed statistical analysis on the pre - treatment and post - treatment cephalograms in both groups. Results Both groups had favorable and markedly changes in the inclination and protrusion of upper incisors ( 0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional anchorage, MIA has been proved to be more efficient in the treatment of Angle Class II1 malocclusion with shorter treatment time. It should be largely recommended in orthodontic clinic.
    • 冯志才; 翁嘉华; 蔡斌; 朱双林; 麦理想; 姚宇; 谢彬; 王大为
    • 摘要: 目的 应用Mini Uni-Twin (MUT)托槽按Begg矫治技术理念矫治安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)畸形,评估其临床矫治效果并初步探讨其矫治机制.方法 选取16例安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)畸形患者,拔除4个第一前磨牙,应用MUT托槽早期结合Begg矫治理念和后期应用直丝弓技术进行矫治,对治疗前后的头影测量项目进行统计分析.结果 16例患者的平均疗程为(16.3±2.6)月.治疗后U1-SN角减小17.94°,U1-NA和L1-NB距离分别减小6.83 mm和1.98 mm,前牙覆(牙合)和覆盖分别减小1.94 mm和6.84 mm,治疗前后差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).结论 应用MUT托槽结合Begg矫治技术的理念可高效应用于安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)畸形的矫治.%Objective To assess the clinical effects of Mini Uni-Twin(MUT) brackets in treating Angle Ⅱ1 malocclusion with the theory of Begg technology and to explore the treatment mechanics.Methods 16 patients with Angle Ⅱ1 malocclusion were extracted 4 first premolars and treated with MUT Brackets,combining Begg technology in the early stage and Edgewise technology in the late stage.The results of cephalometric measurements before and after treatment were statistically analyzed.Results The average treatment time was 16.3 months.After treatment,U1-SN decreased by 17.94°,U1-NA decreased by 6.83 mm,L1-NB decreased by 1.98 mm,overbite decreased by 1.94 mm and overjet decreased by 6.84 mrn.All 5 measurements were different from pre-treatment significantly(P<0.001).Conclusions MUT brackets can be effectively used in treating Angle Ⅱ 1 malocclusion with the theory of Begg technology.
    • 王茜; 左艳萍; 董福生
    • 摘要: 目的 了解排除了自然生长因素后,Twin-block矫治器治疗青少年安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)引起的硬组织改变,从而更为真实、准确地评价该矫治器的矫治效能.方法 于2008年9月至2010年9月在河北医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科门诊选择30例手腕骨片为FG-G期的安氏Ⅱ1下颌后缩患者.治疗组15例,平均年龄11.5岁,采用Twin-block矫正器治疗,平均治疗及保持时间14个月;对照组15例,平均年龄11岁,作为自然生长对照,平均观察时间13个月.对治疗及观察前后头颅X线侧位片的32项硬组织项目进行Pancherz测量分析,评价矫治疗效.结果 排除了自然生长因素的影响,治疗组在采用Twin-block矫治器矫治后,下颌全长、升支高度及下颌体长分别净增加了4.95、4.03和1.67 mm,SNB角(蝶鞍中心、鼻根点及下齿槽座点所构成的角)增加了2.39°;全面高、下面高及后面高均明显增加,但下颌平面保持稳定;上切牙舌倾、下切牙唇倾.在4.76 mm的覆盖减少量和5.22 mm的磨牙关系改善中,牙齿效应分别占61%和75%,骨骼效应占39%和25%.结论 Twin-block矫治器使发育期安氏Ⅱ1错(牙合)患者覆(牙合)覆盖、磨牙关系均得到改善,有效促进了下颌骨矢状方向上的生长发育,Ⅱ类骨面型趋于好转.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号