您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 保脾

保脾

保脾的相关文献在1991年到2022年内共计93篇,主要集中在外科学、基础医学、临床医学 等领域,其中期刊论文93篇、专利文献20638篇;相关期刊66种,包括基层医学论坛、中国临床实用医学、岭南现代临床外科等; 保脾的相关文献由229位作者贡献,包括刘东方、刘向阳、夏德铭等。

保脾—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:93 占比:0.45%

专利文献>

论文:20638 占比:99.55%

总计:20731篇

保脾—发文趋势图

保脾

-研究学者

  • 刘东方
  • 刘向阳
  • 夏德铭
  • 孙红勇
  • 孙艳华
  • 岳善峰
  • 张银良
  • 彭志敏
  • 林东来
  • 王九龙
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 刘川; 谢长远; 王伟林
    • 摘要: 目的研究影响创伤性脾破裂行保脾治疗效果的风险因素,为临床工作提供指导。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月浙江大学医学院附属第二医院余姚分院收治的创伤性脾破裂患者的基础资料、影像数据及预后,利用logistic回归对保脾与脾切除患者的各项数据进行单因素及多因素回归分析,阐明影响创伤性脾破裂患者行保脾治疗的显著性风险因素。结果研究纳入创伤性脾破裂病例共195例,其中男性140例(71.79%),平均年龄47.07岁(11-87岁)。合并其他器官损伤患者148例(75.9%),其中腹腔其他脏器损伤26例(13.33%),胸部损伤126例(64.62%),颅脑损伤38例(19.49%),四肢骨盆损伤46例(23.59%)。成功救治患者193例(98.97%),其中保脾治疗145例(75.13%),脾切除术48(24.87%,5例为介入治疗失败后行脾切除术)。多因素分析发现,休克指数(shock index,SI)、ISS(Injury Severity Scale)/AIS(The Abbreviated Injury Scale)评分值、脾损伤CT分级等3项指标为影响脾破裂患者保脾治疗预后的显著性风险因素(P<0.05)。结论本研究发现,休克指数小于1、ISS/AIS评分<25分,及CT分级1-3级的脾破裂患者,应积极予以保脾,保脾成功率可达95%以上。
    • 周海涛; 郑四鸣
    • 摘要: 胰腺体尾部良性肿瘤的手术方式包括保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术(spleen-preserving distal pancre-atectomy,SPDP)和联合脾脏切除的胰体尾切除术。SPDP较之切除脾脏的胰体尾切除术发生术后感染、腹腔内脓肿以及脾切除术后凶险性感染、血小板增多症等风险明显降低。而胰腺肿瘤与脾脏的解剖关系是决定脾脏是否保留的关键因素。
    • 陈望; 孙铁为
    • 摘要: 近年腹腔镜技术在胰腺外科的应用取得了很大进步,腹腔镜胰体尾切除术得到广泛开展,而腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术由于可最大限度地保留脾脏的生理机能而备受重视.此术式适于胰体尾部良性或低度恶性病变,大大减少了脾切除术后近、远期并发症,手术方式主要包括保留脾动静脉的Kimura术式及切除脾动静脉主干、保留胃短、胃后、胃网膜左血管等侧支循环的Warshaw术式.本文主要将腹腔镜下保脾胰体尾切除术的相关研究进展作一综述.
    • 胡可俊; 陈飞; 张腾飞; 安东
    • 摘要: 目的 探究射频消融辅助的脾修补术在创伤性破裂脾脏患者中应用的临床价值.方法 回顾我院2015年4月至2018年11月收治创伤性脾破裂患者(48例)病史资料,依照手术方式不同分为射频消融辅助下脾修补组(射频修补组14例)和脾切除组(切除组34例).对两组患者术中、术后相关指标差异以及术前、术后第1天及第5天白细胞和血小板计数变化进行比较分析.结果 射频修补组和切除组比较结果:手术时间(min)(127.86 ±36.78 vs 91.38士36.15,P<0.05)、住院费用(万)(3.5士0.9 vs 2.6±1.1,P<0.05),术后72h腹腔引流总量(ml)(180.0±171.6 vs 301.2±161.7,P<0.05),腹腔引流管留管时间(d)(5.4±1.8 vs 7.4±2.5,P<0.05),禁食时间(d)(3.0±0.96 vs 4.0±1.37,P<0.05),住院时间(d)(12.14±7.13 vs 21.44士9.06,P<0.05);射频修补组较切除组术后手术创伤应激小且无继发血小板增高.两组术中输血率,术后并发症:发热、胸积液、切口裂开、下肢静脉血栓形成发生率均无差异(P>0.05).结论 在生命体征稳定的Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级脾损伤患者中行射频消融辅助脾修补术安全、可行.
    • 马凯; 吴泽华; 宋孟錡; 冯玉杰; 韩冰; 孙传东; 张炳远; 邱法波; 张顺; 郭卫东; 李潇箫; 朱呈瞻; 邹浩
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨机器人超凝缝合法与传统达芬奇手术方式在Kimura保脾胰体尾切除术中的临床疗效及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2014年10月至2020年1月在青岛大学附属医院因胰腺体尾部良性肿瘤行达芬奇辅助下Kimura胰体尾切除术的31例患者.采用机器人超凝缝合法的患者8例(试验组)和采用传统手的患者23例(对照组),比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流管引流量、术后引流液淀粉酶、手术费用、拔除引流管时间、术后住院时间、术后病理等.结果 试验组8例患者,其中男1例、女7例;年龄23 ~ 62岁,平均43岁;对照组23例患者,其中男5例、女18例,年龄19 ~ 75岁,平均49岁.试验组与对照组单因素分析:性别(P =0.584),年龄(P=0.445),术后并发症(P =0.036),手术时间(P =0.992),术中出血量(P =0.909),术后住院时间(P =0.403),手术费用(P =0.527).结论 机器人超凝缝合法在达芬奇辅助下Kiruma保脾胰体尾切除术中安全、有效,值得临床推广.
    • 张德华; 李新华; 朱延安; 张琪
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨急诊脾动脉栓塞(splenic artery embolization SAE)在创伤性脾破裂保脾术中的应用.方法 回顾性分析本院2016年1月至2018年8月45例腹部增强CT提示Ⅱ~Ⅲ级创伤性脾破裂患者行急诊脾动脉栓塞术.结果 45例患者均一次栓塞成功,其中36例患者行脾动脉主干近段栓塞,材料均选择钢圈联合明胶海绵,9例行远端明胶海绵止血;本组44例保脾成功,其中1例为明胶海绵栓塞再发出血后予以钢圈联合明胶海绵栓塞止血保脾成功;另1例为脾动脉钢圈联合明胶海绵栓塞术后第3天再发出血,予以开腹脾切除.结论急诊脾动脉栓塞术可提高Ⅱ~Ⅲ级创伤性脾破裂患者的保脾成功率,术后并发症少,保留了脾脏的功能,可缩短住院时间,值得临床推广应用.
    • 赵旭东
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨选择性脾动脉栓塞术在儿童外伤性脾破裂中的应用价值.方法 选取2013年1月至2017年6月无合并其他脏器损伤的外伤性脾破裂患儿30例,男19例,女11例,年龄6~12岁.30例患儿采用选择性脾动脉栓塞术行保脾治疗.结果 30例患儿行选择性脾动脉栓塞术均保脾成功,手术时间30~60 min,术后常规留右股动脉鞘管,24 h后拔除.无一例需中转开腹手术或需二次栓塞止血.结论 选择性脾动脉栓塞术止血疗效确切,无二次出血,无延迟性出血,住院时间短,值得临床推广.
    • 陈军强; 俞世安; 许龙堂
    • 摘要: Objective To study the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) in the treatment of pancreatic benign and borderline tumors.Methods The clinical data of 15 patients with preoperative diagnoses of pancreatic benign or borderline tumors who underwent LSPDP in the Jinhua Hospital,Zhejiang University from March 2013 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.The diameter of tumors ranged from 2.6 to 6.8 cm,with an average of 4.4 cm.Results 15 patients were successfully treated with LSPDP.Twelve patients underwent splenic vessels preservation and 3 without splenic vessels preservation.The average operation time was 215 min (160 ~ 270 min).The mean intraoperative blood loss was 340 ml (180 ~700 ml),and the average postoperative hospital stay was 10.5 days (7 ~ 16 days).There was no patient with postoperative abdominal hemorrhage.Three patients developed postoperative pancreatic fistula and they were treated successfully with conservative therapy.Two patients developed splenic infarction,and the splenic infarction improved markedly after two months on CT.The pathological diagnoses showed 9 patients with serous cystadenoma,4 patients with mucinous cystadenoma,1 patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and 1 patient with a solid pseudopapillary tumor.There was no recurrence on follow-up which ranged from 6 to 24 months.Conclusions Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was safe and feasible in the treatment of pancreatic benign or borderline tumors.The Kimura procedure should be performed in preference to the Warshaw procedure.%目的 探讨腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺体尾部良性及交界性肿瘤的安全性、可行性.方法 回顾性分析浙江大学金华医院2013年3月至2017年3月15例腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术患者临床资料,术前诊断为胰腺体尾部良性及交界性肿瘤.肿瘤直径为2.6 ~6.8 cm,平均4.4 cm.结果 15例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术.其中12例保留脾动静脉,3例未保留.患者平均手术时间215(160 ~ 270) min,术中平均出血量340(180~700) ml,术后平均住院时间10.5(7 ~16)d,术后无腹腔出血发生.术后胰漏3例,予保守治疗后治愈.术后脾梗死2例,无二次行脾切除术,2个月后复查CT示脾梗死明显好转.术后病理:浆液性囊腺瘤9例,黏液性囊性瘤4例,神经内分泌肿瘤、实性假乳头状瘤各1例.术后随访6个月~2年,无肿瘤复发.结论 腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性及交界性肿瘤安全可行.术式应首选Kimura法,Warshaw法作为补充.
    • 王栋; 钟志惟; 殷香保; 黄明文; 袁荣发; 王婷; 邬林泉; 娄思源
    • 摘要: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Kimura method and Warshaw method) for benign lesions of pancreatic body and tail.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 39 patients with benign lesions of pancreatic body and tail who underwent laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between March 2008 and January 2018 were collected.Of 39 patients,28 undergoing Kimura method (splenic artery and vein-preserving distal pancreatectomy) were allocated into the Kimura group,and 11 undergoing Warshaw method (cutting splenic vessels and preserving short gastric vessels)due to serious adhesion between pancreatic body and tail and splenic hilum were allocated into the Warshaw group.Observation indicators:(1) operation situations;(2) postoperative situations;(3) follow-up situations.Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect blood glucose level and tumor recurrence of patients up to March 2018.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range) and comparison between groups was done using nonparametric rank-sum test.Comparisons of count data were analyzed using chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Operation situations:39 patients received laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy,operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss of 39 patients were respectively (194 ±58)minutes and 100 mL (range,30-800 mL).The operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were respectively (197±56)minutes,100 mL (range,30-800 mL) in the Kimura group and (186±63)minutes,150 mL (range,30-450 mL) in the Warshaw group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.494,Z =-0.597,P> 0.05).(2) Postoperative situations:time to anal exsufflation and duration of hospital stay were respectively (2.6±0.8)days,(9.2±7.3)days in 39 patients and (2.4±0.6)days,(7.5±4.2)days in the Kimura group and (2.8±1.3)days,(13.5±11.1)days in the Warshaw group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t=-0.720,-1.736,P>0.05).Seven patients had postoperative complications.The incidence of complication was 2/28 in the Kimura group,1 patient with pancreatic leakage at 5 days postoperatively was cured by 15-day B ultrasound guided catheter drainage,and 1 who was diagnosed as pulmonary infection by chest CT examination at 5 days postoperatively was discharged from hospital after 8-day anti-infection and sputum-inductive treatments.The incidence of complication was 5/11 in the Warshaw group,3 patients with sustained fever at 5 and 7 days postoperatively who were diagnosed as grade 1 splenic infarction by epigastric enhanced CT examination were improved and discharged from hospital by antibiotic and low molecular weight heparin treatments,and then epigastric enhanced CT re-examination at 3 months postoperatively showed recovery of splenic perfusion;1 with pancreatic leakage at 7 days postoperatively was cured by 18-day conservative treatment;1 who was diagnosed as delayed gastric emptying by upper gastrointestinal contrast at 16 days postoperatively was improved and then discharged from hospital by 15-day placement of intestinal feeding tube and nutrition support therapy.There were statistically significant differences in the incidences of overall complication and splenic infarction between groups (x2 =5.485,4.878,P<0.05) and no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other complications between groups (P>0.05).(3) Follow-up situations:39 patients were followed up for 12 months (range,2-64 months).During the follow-up,six patients had normal blood glucose level,and all patients had good quality of life,without recurrence.Conclusions Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for the benign lesions of pancreatic body and tail is satisfactory in short-and long-term curative effects.The incidences of complication and splenic infarction of Kimura method are lower than that of Warshaw method.%目的 探讨腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术(Kimura法和Warshaw法)治疗胰体尾良性病变的临床疗效.方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法.收集2008年3月至2018年1月南昌大学第二附属医院收治的39例胰体尾良性病变行腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术患者的临床病理资料,其中28例行Kimura法(保留脾动、静脉的胰体尾切除术)保脾,设为Kimura组;11例因胰体尾部与脾门间粘连严重无法分离行Warshaw法(离断脾血管而保留胃短血管的胰体尾切除术)保脾,设为Warshaw组.观察指标:(1)手术情况.(2)术后情况.(3)随访情况.采用门诊或电话方式进行随访,随访内容包括患者血糖情况、肿瘤复发情况,随访时间截至2018年3月.正态分布计量资料以(x)±s表示,组间比较采用t检验.偏态分布计量资料采用M(范围)表示,组间比较采用非参数秩和检验.计数资料组间比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法.结果 (1)手术情况:39例患者均完成腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术,手术时间为(194 ±58) min,术中出血量为100 mL(30~800 mL).Kimura组与Warshaw组患者的手术时间分别为(197±56) min和(186±63) min、术中出血量分别为100 mL(30~ 800 mL)和150 mL(30~450 mL),两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.494,Z=-0.597,P>0.05).(2)术后情况:39例患者术后肛门排气时间为(2.6±0.8)d,术后住院时间为(9.2±7.3)d.Kimura组与Warshaw组患者术后肛门排气时间分别为(2.4±0.6)d和(2.8±1.3)d,术后住院时间分别为(7.5±4.2)d和(13.5±11.1)d,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.720,-1.736,P>0.05).39例患者中术后共有7例发生并发症.Kimura组患者并发症发生率为2/28,其中1例于术后第5天出现胰液漏,经B超引导下置管引流后15 d后治愈;1例于术后第5天行胸部CT检查提示肺部感染,经积极抗感染、促进排痰等治疗8d后顺利出院.Warshaw组患者并发症发生率为5/11,其中3例分别于术后第5天、第7天开始出现持续发热,行腹上区增强CT检查均提示脾梗死1级,经使用抗生素、低分子肝素等药物治疗,症状缓解后出院,术后3个月复查腹上区增强CT提示恢复脾灌注;1例子术后第7天发现胰液漏,经保守治疗18d后治愈;1例于术后16d行上消化道造影检查提示胃排空障碍,经留置空肠营养管、加强营养支持治疗半月后胃功能逐渐恢复并顺利出院.两组患者总体并发症发生率和脾梗死发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=5.485,4.878,P<0.05),其余并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).(3)随访情况:39例患者均获得术后随访,随访时间为2~64个月,中位随访时间为12个月.随访期间,6例胰岛细胞瘤患者血糖基本正常,所有患者生命质量良好,无一例复发.结论 对胰体尾部局限性良性病变行腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术近、远期疗效满意.Kimura法患者术后并发症和脾梗死发生率较Warshaw法更低.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号