• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian military history >The Myth of the Learning Curve Tactics and Training in the 12th Canadian Infantry Brigade, 1916-1918
【24h】

The Myth of the Learning Curve Tactics and Training in the 12th Canadian Infantry Brigade, 1916-1918

机译：1916-1918年加拿大第12步兵旅学习曲线战术与训练的神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Canadian military historians generally accept that during the First World War the Canadian military improved over time. This idea of a "learning curve" suggests that Canadians began the war as inexperienced colonial volunteers and, as the Corps gained experience on the battlefield, commanders and ordinary soldiers alike learned from their mistakes and successes and improved combat tactics from battle to battle and from year to year. Several different approaches to this argument are evident in the literature. Tim Cook and Bill Rawling both published works in the mid-1990s that argue technology was the impetus behind this process of learning. On the other hand, Shane Schreiber, James McWilliams and R. James Steel have focused on what they see as the ultimate success of the learning curve: the August 1918 Battle of Amiens. However, while technology played an important role in the conduct of the war, and the Battle of Amiens was indeed a significant Allied victory, one question remains: where is the hard evidence that this learning curve exists?
机译：加拿大军事历史学家普遍认为，在第一次世界大战期间，加拿大军队不断发展。这种“学习曲线”的想法表明，加拿大人是没有经验的殖民志愿者开始战争的，而随着军团在战场上的经验的积累，指挥官和普通士兵也从他们的错误和成功中吸取了教训，并且从战斗到战斗以及从年复一年。在文献中显然有几种不同的方法可以解决这个问题。蒂姆·库克（Tim Cook）和比尔·罗林（Bill Rawling）都在1990年代中期发表了作品，认为技术是这种学习过程的推动力。另一方面，Shane Schreiber，James McWilliams和R. James Steel专注于他们认为学习曲线的最终成功：1918年8月的亚眠战役。然而，尽管技术在战争的进行中起着重要作用，而亚眠战役确实是盟军的重大胜利，但仍然存在一个问题：在哪里有这种学习曲线的确凿证据？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号