首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Construct equivalence across groups: An unexplored issue in mentoring research
【24h】

Construct equivalence across groups: An unexplored issue in mentoring research

机译:跨小组构建等效性:指导研究中的一个尚未探索的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ensuring construct comparability is a prerequisite for testing cross-group differences, yet this assumption is rarely tested in mentoring research. More studies testing for factorial invariance are needed for the construct validation of mentoring. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used to investigate the factorial stability of the Mentoring Functions Questionnaire (MFQ-9) across two groups: proteges who are satisfied with their mentor and those who are not. CFA results supported a three-factor structure for the MFQ-9 composed of the dimensions of vocational support, psychosocial support, and role modeling. However, tests of invariance demonstrated nonequivalence for five item-pair measurements. Overall, the MFQ-9 demonstrated excellent psychometric properties with unsatisfied proteges; however, the instrument may need further development for use with satisfied proteges.
机译:确保构造的可比性是检验跨群体差异的前提,但是在指导研究中很少检验这种假设。为了指导的结构验证,需要更多的因式不变性测试研究。使用多组确认性因子分析(CFA)来调查两组指导功能调查表(MFQ-9)的因子稳定性,即对指导者满意的产品和对指导者不满意的产品。 CFA的结果支持了MFQ-9的三要素结构,该结构由职业支持,心理支持和角色榜样组成。但是,不变性测试显示五个项目对测量值不相等。总体而言,MFQ-9表现出出色的心理测量性能,并且不满足要求。但是,该仪器可能需要进一步开发才能与满意的产品配合使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号